Bank of America's (NYSE:BAC) plan to repay $45 billion in TARP bailout funds, which was completed this week, left Citigroup (NYSE:C) in a lurch. Citi now urgently wants to repay the government's $20 billion preferred share investment as quickly as possible; however, unless they can organize the capital raising and finalize other aspects of the transaction in a matter of days, they may have to wait until after they report fourth-quarter earnings. Here's why I think Citi management will be cooling their heels over the holidays instead of toasting their independence.

Citi, You're no Bank of America
According to Bloomberg, B of A had been negotiating with government officials for two months prior to completing its exit from TARP. Citi only stepped its negotiations into high gear on hearing B of A's December 2nd announcement, which took them by surprise. Furthermore, Citi's situation is more complicated than its Charlotte-based rival:

  • The government also owns a 34% equity stake in Citi and insists the exit process from this shareholding must be determined before repayment of TARP funds can proceed.
  • Citi's lending activity is weaker than B of A's.

High capital ratio, low credibility
Despite the fact that Citi has the highest Tier 1 common equity ratio of the top five U.S. commercial banks (see table below), it is a dysfunctional entity, with a history of lending missteps going back at least as far back as predecessor Citicorp's 1980s LDC debt crisis (LDC: least developed countries -- the previous term for "emerging market").

Company

Tier 1 Common Equity Ratio %
(Sept. 30, 2009)

Citigroup

9.1

Bank of America -- Pro forma, adjusted for capital actions

8.5

JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM)

8.2

US Bancorp (NYSE:USB)

6.8

PNC Financial Services (NYSE:PNC)

5.5

Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC)

5.2

Source: Bank of America presentation, PNC Financial Services presentation.

There's no rush
On that basis, it seems only right that Citi should be the last to repay its TARP investment; I certainly don't see any reason why the government need share the bank's sense of vital urgency. In fact, hastily authorizing repayment would send a perverse message to the company's management and investors: "Citi's crisis is over. There's nothing to see here; move along, please."

A temporary reprieve for Citi shareholders?
At the end of November, I warned Citigroup shareholders concerning the risk of share dilution from a capital raising. That risk reared its head sooner than even I had anticipated. All the same, I don't think it will be realized on Citi's rushed timetable. If not, that would give existing shareholders some time during which they should carefully consider their position -- all the while keeping in mind that any reprieve in dilution is likely to be only temporary.

It's tough to make money on companies that require government bailouts. Rich Greifner looks at one company with all the attributes of a successful investment.