If you live by the mortgage, you should die by the mortgage. That's what many folks appear to have expected for leading mortgage lender Wells Fargo
All things considered, the first quarter wasn't so bad. Results may have been a little short of analyst guesstimates, but revenue still rose 6%, net income still climbed 9%, and earnings per share still shot up by 10%. While the bank's return on assets was down slightly, return on equity ticked up a bit, and book value saw double-digit growth from last year.
Perhaps because they compete for deposits in many of the same markets, I often think of U.S.Bancorp
Loan growth was once again pretty strong as well. Reported growth of 8% isn't bad, and when you subtract the impact of large mortgage loan sales, the resulting 17% growth is all the more impressive. Likewise on the deposit side -- growth in average core deposits was 9% when stripping out mortgage escrow, yet the bank's overall cost of funds ended up at a rather reasonable 2.65%.
Looking a little deeper, I found it interesting, though not necessarily surprising, that the community-banking business had a tough quarter, while the wholesale-banking and financial arms did better. And that, in short, is one of the virtues of a well-diversified banking business -- if one segment or business drops the ball, there's usually a compensating business elsewhere that's doing pretty well.
Since I'll probably be writing on a few dozen different banks before this earnings season is done, I clearly can't love every bank stock I write about. So although I think Wells Fargo is still a fine bank, I'll leave it to Fools to decide for themselves where Wells Fargo fits in amongst the likes of U.S. Bancorp, Wachovia
For more Foolishness to bank on:
U.S. Bancorp is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendation. For more of Tom and David Gardner's picks, try out Stock Advisor free for 30 days.
Fool contributor Stephen Simpson has no financial interest in any stocks mentioned (that means he's neither long nor short the shares).