Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Confidence ... or Con Game?

By Alyce Lomax - Updated Apr 5, 2017 at 8:08PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Despite all the bailouts, I don't feel any more confident. Do you?

From the beginning of the current financial crisis, many officials have been insisting that a big part of our problem is "confidence." Remember back when the $700 billion bailout was supposed to inject "confidence" into the financial system?

I can't help but think of another definition of "confidence" -- as in a confidence, or "con," game. When you think about it, trying to gain someone's confidence in order to grift them out of their hard-earned dollars really isn't an outlandish metaphor for our current situation.

The nationalization of spending
The parade of moves that the Treasury's Henry Paulson and the Fed's Ben Bernanke have made over the course of 2008 are dizzying in their complexity, expense, and confusion. The latest is the bailout -- basically, the nationalization -- of Citigroup (NYSE:C), putting taxpayers on the hook for additional billions of dollars.

While the nationalization of corporations bothers me deeply on a philosophical level, other recent plans bother me on a more commonsense level. The Fed and the Treasury announced $800 billion extra, including a portion meant to stimulate consumer spending, including credit cards, auto loans, and student loans. Again, it has long been clear to some of us little people that the major problems our economy faces are due to way too much easy credit -- and easy credit's best accessory, short-term thinking.

The Fed and the Treasury continue to be hell-bent on doing all they can to persuade consumers -- many of whom are already far over their heads in debt -- to continue spending money they don't have. There's something downright morally reprehensible about that, but some seem to believe that's the way the economy can be "saved." We're all supposed to dig ourselves in deeper -- and of course, given the government's soaring deficit, it's doing the same thing.

Who's naive, again?
Meanwhile, some of us feel like we've gotten mugged, since the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) so far has not worked according to its intended plan, which was to unfreeze credit. (I'm still wondering if the real problem is that banks realized that it is, I don't know, kind of unsustainable to lend to those who probably won't be able to pay it back.)

Henry Paulson then said it was naive to believe the TARP would work quickly. It's funny, but if I were a guy who had pushed the panic button, then repeatedly changed strategy while throwing around hundreds of billions, I don't think I'd be calling anybody naive. And of course, Paulson's insistence earlier this year that the economic problems were contained and controllable should definitely sound naive to those of us who already figured our overheated economy was due for a whopper of a recession.

I also can't forget Bernanke arguing during the bailout controversy that if we didn't get TARP there would be a recession. This seemed strange to me at the time -- I strongly suspected we were already in a recession back in April, despite so many people's assurances we were not. And just today, the National Bureau of Economic Research has announced that, guess what, we have been in a recession since this time last year.  Will wonders never cease?

Confidence vs. common sense
Call me crazy, but consumers shouldn't feel so economically confident, particularly since their wallets are stuffed with cards bearing the logos of Visa (NYSE:V), MasterCard (NYSE:MA), Discover Financial (NYSE:DFS), and American Express (NYSE:AXP) -- cards which have put them into so much debt that they may not pay it off for decades.

Neither should the people who pinched, scrimped, and saved their money and are now getting no return on their savings due to aggressive interest rate slashing. (And of course, let's not forget the inflationary effects of the money printing presses working overtime.) These are the people who refused to buy into the housing bubble and now can't even buy cheap real estate, because the government is so determined to prop up housing prices for everyone who bought into the collective economic delusions that got us into this mess.

The bailouts need to end, as more and more companies line up for government help: homebuilders like Toll Brothers (NYSE:TOL) and automakers like General Motors (NYSE:GM) need to sink or swim, on their own, and consumers need to be allowed to work on fiscal responsibility. I don't see anything wrong with the market being allowed to work as it is meant to, with natural cycles that do, in fact, include recessions, which will weed out the weak and greedy players that made dangerous mistakes and sacrificed good business sense for unsustainable short-term profits.

Contemplating confidence
If anything, I think it's high time our culture takes a break from some of the misguided "confidence" it has exhibited for quite some time now. The overwhelming message seems to be that we all need to spend our economy back into growth, but if we read between the lines, it's clear that growth over at least the past decade has been artificial, fired up by debt and a "confidence" that had no grounds in realistic measures like "income."

The policy appears to be to do everything possible to try to keep the natural correction from occurring -- although many of us believe it must occur for our economy to be healthy again -- and insist that everybody be confident, for Pete's sake. With all the talk of confidence, one good question might be why we should feel confident in a system that is propping up bad decisions and policies and even encouraging people to repeat the mistakes that got us here.

That's when it's easy to wonder if it is one heck of a confidence game, indeed.

Discover Financial Services and American Express Company are Motley Fool Inside Value picks. The Fool owns shares of American Express Company. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days.

Alyce Lomax does not own shares of any of the companies mentioned. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Citigroup Inc. Stock Quote
Citigroup Inc.
$52.61 (-1.75%) $0.94
American Express Company Stock Quote
American Express Company
$162.24 (-1.46%) $-2.41
Visa Inc. Stock Quote
Visa Inc.
$212.82 (-1.13%) $-2.43
Mastercard Incorporated Stock Quote
Mastercard Incorporated
$354.28 (-0.86%) $-3.08
General Motors Company Stock Quote
General Motors Company
$39.70 (2.53%) $0.98
Toll Brothers, Inc. Stock Quote
Toll Brothers, Inc.
$47.26 (-3.55%) $-1.74
Discover Financial Services Stock Quote
Discover Financial Services
$106.91 (-1.44%) $-1.56

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
S&P 500 Returns

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 08/19/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.