OK, maybe not everyone's lying to you, but it sure does feel that way.
You don't have to go far to catch an earful of big-fish stories and half-baked forecasts coming out of Wall Street, Washington, and the boob tube.
Witness the Moody's
Everyone has some vested interest in coloring his or her version of the truth. Whether they're padding their pockets, protecting their reputations, or making headlines, everyone has a motive. The trick is to separate motives from facts. While aligning your interests with the truth doesn't guarantee success, it sure beats chasing down a pack of lies.
Here are three economic fibs you should disregard.
Lie No. 1: Consumer spending will solve our problems
While the National Retail Federation may love articles like Newsweek's "Stop Saving Now," such commentaries are reckless attempts to reinflate the consumer credit bubble and inflate readership. In this particular essay, the author even labels savers as "hoarders" and encourages businesses "to roll the dice."
On the contrary, consumers and businesses need to spend prudently, save frequently, and invest intelligently. Thankfully, Americans are consuming more intelligently, bending on brand, and seeking out Costco's
Based on data in a recent New York Times article, consumers have even turned toward old-school home economics: Coupon redemptions climbed 23% in the first half of this year. Amazingly, the top coupon users are originating from households earning $70,000 or more. Little wonder that BJ's Wholesale
Lie No. 2: Housing will bounce back
Real estate doesn't bounce. Not only is appreciation dead for now, it may never have existed in the first place. Dennis Cauchon made that point in a USA TODAY report, with data showing that "the average annual investment return [in real estate] from 1950-2000 was less than one-half of 1% per year, after adjusting for inflation."
Housing has two major purposes: a place to live and an investment. When you buy a home to live in, your goal is to acquire a dwelling that brings you pleasure, while carrying a cost of ownership that is competitive with what you would otherwise pay in rent.
If you buy for investment purposes, you need to perform a discounted cash flow analysis based on the estimated rental cash flows. Either way, appreciation should not be part of the equation.
With unemployment still on the rise, housing inventories still sky-high, and the pending defaults on "pay option" and interest-only loans looming, the business models of homebuilders such as Toll Brothers
Lie No. 3: (Insert name here) is too big to fail.
Don't believe the hype; no company is too big to fail. Even nations are not too big to fail, as demonstrated by the fall of Rome and the decline of the British Empire. Instead, these institutions are so globally intertwined that their failures would cause side effects unbearable to business leaders and elected officials alike. Thus, there's a difference between being too big to fail, and being too important to fail.
Would Americans have accepted the loss of their life savings beyond the FDIC threshold? Could the country have stomached endless lines of irate customers demanding their deposits from their seemingly safe national bank of choice?
There's no doubt we could have survived it, but politicians tend to dislike civil unrest, and business owners aren't fond of riots. The "too big to fail" travesty seems like an avoidable consequence of bank centralization. Keep in mind that between 1984 and 2003, the size of our banking system declined by almost 48%, as 15,084 entities consolidated into 7,842.
That's why superstar analyst Meredith Whitney's idea to supercharge regional banks, instead of feeding the national lenders, appears to be an interesting alternative. It would be refreshing to see local institutions allocating more capital, instead of watching national megabank zombies hoard liquidity.
Believe your lying eyes
Tall tales are common when it comes to matters of money, but don't let the hot air take you off course. The key is not to debate opinions, but to explore facts. No one can predict the economy's behavior, so why try? Instead, focus on great businesses that execute, and management teams that don't lie to you.
Foolish stock experts David and Tom Gardner avoid fish tales. This pair of straight shooters take their big catches in stride, and don't lament the ones that got away.
As the advisors of our Motley Fool Stock Advisor newsletter, they're dedicated to discovering great businesses, and exposing the market's dirty little secrets. They aren't afraid to throw the stinkers overboard. As a result, Tom and David's picks have handily outperformed the S&P 500 since their newsletter service's inception in 2002.
Can you handle the truth? Click here to see which companies passed the test in Stock Advisor. A trial is free for 30 days, including full privileges to the service.
Already subscribe to Stock Advisor? Log in at the top of this page.
This article was originally published on May 18, 2009. It has been updated.
Fool analyst Andy Louis-Charles doesn't own shares in any company mentioned, but he has been known to clip a coupon or three. Costco, Moody's, and Whole Foods are Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendations. Costco and Moody's are Inside Value picks. The Fool owns shares of Costco. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.