To borrow a phrase, I was shocked, shocked to hear on Monday morning that General Motors' interim CEO Ed Whitacre has decided that the best possible candidate for the company's permanent CEO spot is ... Ed Whitacre.
What is this, the Dick Cheney school of candidate selection?
To be fair, GM could have done worse. Selecting another company lifer like Fritz Henderson would have been a lot worse, for instance. But it wasn't all that long ago that Whitacre and GM promised us a global search for the best possible candidate, the one person who could be to GM's hidebound culture what Alan Mulally has been to Ford's
And Ed Whitacre is the guy they came up with?
Why I'm not actually surprised
It may actually be true that Whitacre, the former AT&T
Or more to the point, the best candidate who would actually take the job.
See, this wasn't exactly a routine executive search. First, the job itself -- turning around an enormous, iconic, but badly wounded industrial behemoth -- is going to be incredibly difficult. It's one thing to relish a challenge, it's another entirely to take on an extremely visible job with a real probability of failure.
Second, as we all know, GM's largest shareholder at the moment is the U.S. government, thanks to the debt-to-equity provisions of the $50 billion or so in loans that kept the company afloat last year. Those loans came with some awkward strings, including limits on executive compensation that were widely expected to complicate GM's search.
Long story short, we're talking about an enormous, grueling job with a high risk of epic public failure -- and lousy pay.
Looked at through that lens, this might actually be a pretty good choice.
Why it might be a good choice
The transformation set in motion by Alan Mulally and his team at Ford has to be the model for GM's next few years, and I'm sure it's in the forefront of the minds of everyone on GM's board, including Whitacre.
Like Mulally, Whitacre comes with an outsider's perspective, experience in transforming huge organizations, and the personality and confidence to drive dramatic change. But unlike Mulally, who came to Ford from Boeing
Still, Whitacre's moves so far have been promising. Consider:
- Keeping Opel. Henderson had put Opel, GM's European division, on the block as part of a brand-shedding effort. Whitacre reversed that -- a good move, since Opel is the center of GM's small-car expertise. Just as Ford has integrated its European division more tightly with North America, bringing excellent Euro-designed cars to our shores, Opel will do the same for GM.
- Moving to shed or close Saab. Saabs have historically had many virtues, but the brand was nearing invisibility in the U.S., and closing it or dumping it is the right thing to do.
- Moving to repay debt. Much of the government's loan to GM was converted to equity, but $6.7 billion of debt remains on the automaker's balance sheets and is set to mature in 2015. Whitacre recently said that he expects to pay all of that back by June of this year. I've knocked GM's rush to pay that debt in the past, but as the economy and the company's condition improve, I'm more inclined to see it as a good move. With Whitacre now saying that GM may be profitable by the end of this year, paying back the taxpayers might turn out to be a great and affordable PR move.
Still interim, just a longer interim
Whitacre is 68, and is obviously not going to hold this job indefinitely. GM recently hired 51-year-old Chris Liddell away from Microsoft
I suspect that the board's thinking is that installing Whitacre as non-interim CEO is a way to get Liddell a couple of years of seasoning under a veteran executive who won't resist leaving when the time comes. That's all well and good, but Ford, Toyota
Once again, we'll just have to wait and see.