Whether we liked the concept of it or not, the TARP portion of the U.S. government-sponsored bailout has been reasonably successful. Out of $250 billion that the government injected into banks that needed a financial lifeline, $216 billion has already been repaid.
Understandably, the primary focus of these funds was on banks considered "too big to fail," and we sometimes forget to examine how the smaller banks are faring. Many of the regional and community banks are struggling to repay the bailout money.
With nearly 600 institutions holding on to more than $30 billion of taxpayers' money, payback seems like a tall order for some of them. Bear in mind, the government can profit from all its emergency investments only if these institutions avoid defaulting on their payments.
The sad picture
Two years into the bailout, some of these banks are still unprofitable on a banking basis. For example, Synovus Financial
Another loss-making bank is Sterling Financial
These are just a few banks that are still making losses while sitting on bailouts. In fairness, there are many that are in a better position, such as SunTrust Banks
Yet, it must also be noted that SunTrust has a market cap of $15 billion. Just as megabanks are finding it easier to repay the government that small- and medium-sized banks, even among the non-megabanks it's the bigger ones who are surviving. Clearly, the moral hazard inherent in TARP has come into play. This is where the smaller banks find it difficult to compete against giants such as Citigroup
The Foolish concern
According to the chairman of the Congressional Oversight Panel, the government has not done enough to enforce capital requirements -- the very thing that allows banks to have a cushion in case their investments lose money. Many of the smaller banks lack exactly that, which shows in the desperation to be bought by bigger and more liquid institutions that can capitalize off of larger economies of scale and greater political and regulatory access.
In order to restore the financial security of banks -- both large and small -- minimum capital ratios must be strictly imposed in order to prevent banks from opting for high-risk and unpredictable investments that may or may not yield huge short-term profits.
But the bigger issue here is whether small banks in general stand a chance at survival over the long term. For big banks, the worst of the financial crisis is over. For many small and regional banks, however, the crisis is still very much on.
Isac Simon does not own shares of any of the companies mentioned in this article. The Fool owns shares of Wells Fargo. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.