"There are those that see JSF as the last manned fighter. I'm … inclined to believe that." -- Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff
It's been a couple years since Admiral Mullen declared Boeing's
"Just as good as an F/A-18"
The F-35's "B" variant is currently undergoing flight tests with the Marine Corps. DefenseNews.com gives us a progress report: "There are some subtle differences in maximum turn rates and some slight differences in where corner airspeeds are exactly [the same]." But overall, the F-35 bears a close resemblance to the F/A-18 Hornet. Quite similar in all but two respects:
First, price. Long-term, the Pentagon hopes to bring the average cost of a generic F-35 down to $80 million per plane, but flyaway costs on the F-35B are running $150 million apiece today. As I pointed out last year, Boeing's price concessions are likely to squeeze profits at the aerospace giant. But these sacrifices may be worth it.
The reason is our second point: Stealth. If Lockheed's F-35 basically duplicates the F/A-18 Hornet … why does it cost more than three times as much? The obvious answer is that the F-35 pairs F/A-18 aerodynamics with F-117 stealth capabilities. It's a much more "survivable" airplane. But does every plane in the Air Force, Navy, and Marines really need to be stealthy? When most of these planes are bombing caves and strafing pirates, in countries where the most serious anti-aircraft threat is an AK-47 pointed at the sky?
Seems a bit overkill. Seems a bit expensive for a military that's being asked to cut $1 trillion from its budget. And it seems to me this gives Boeing an opening to sell a few F/A-18s. After all, in some respects, they're "just as good" as the F-35...
Will Pentagon budget cuts give Boeing an opening here? Add the stock to your Fool Watchlist and find out.
Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own shares of any company named above, but The Motley Fool owns shares of Raytheon, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors