We've all heard the rumors. Lockheed Martin's
But there's a plus-side to all Lockheed's troubles … for Boeing
Don't believe it. From where I sit, it sounds like Boeing is "talking its book." It's trying to create positive buzz on the Hornet, in hopes of convincing buyers that "everyone else" is buying it -- so they should, too.
An intriguing idea
Oh, I'll admit the idea has some merit. After all, the U.S. government is buying F/A-18s to "fill the gap" in its combat air patrol. I've argued for years that Boeing will continue making similar sales to budget-minded foreign air forces as well. It's not out of the fighter jet business yet.
But consider: Given their druthers, do you really believe foreign buyers prefer the F/A-18 over the F-35? In the Mideast, Israel is buying as many of the latter as it can get its hands on. I can't imagine that Arab governments in the neighborhood relish the idea of bringing a fourth-generation knife to a fourth-generation gunfight. In Asia, China's well on its way to building a home-grown stealth fighter jet, and what Japan would really like is to buy itself a few F-22 stealth fighters. If that's not possible, I expect they'll be willing to trade down to the F-35 -- but not go back one whole generation and load up on F/A-18s.
I'll bet most countries in the neighborhood think similarly. My read on Boeing's announcement: Until it backs up its words with a few honest-to-goodness international sales contracts, this is mere sales puffery. As for the F-35: It remains the key reason for owning Lockheed today, and the basis of Lockheed's multidecade growth story.
Read along as the story progresses: Add Lockheed Martin to your Fool Watchlist.
Fool contributor Rich Smith holds no position in any company mentioned, but The Motley Fool owns shares of Lockheed Martin. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.