Investing decisions are made from a mosaic of data, yet synthesizing what matters can be tough. Enter the Fool poll. We show you the Big Headlines, you tell us what’s factoring into your investing decisions, and help your fellow Fools in the process.
DC Entertainment makes official its bid to become more like Marvel, its longtime comic-book publishing rival, when Green Lantern hits theaters one week from today. Call it the Hollywood equivalent of an all-in bet -- one that investors aren't sure will pay off.
Shares of DC parent Time Warner
Recent history may also play a role in the selloff. While Marvel's Thor has been an unqualified success, bringing in $170 million at the U.S. box office and more than $420 million worldwide, X-Men: First Class netted just $55 million during its opening weekend -- the second-lowest debut gate in the history of the X-franchise, according to Box Office Mojo.
Mix in a busy summer film slate that includes Cars 2, The Smurfs, Captain America: The First Avenger, Super 8, and new installments in the Transformers and Harry Potter franchises, and you’ve got legitimate grounds for thinking there’s zero chance that Green Lantern can achieve what Iron Man did in 2008. Yet that's exactly what Time Warner wants and needs now that the Harry Potter series is ending.
It's a high hurdle. Iron Man took in more than $300 million at the U.S. box office and established Marvel as a Big Name in tentpole moviemaking. Fifteen months later, Walt Disney
A successful debut for Green Lantern would give DC the credibility needed to build franchises around other Justice League names known mostly to comic-book geeks like me. Names like The Flash, Wonder Woman, Hawkman, Martian Manhunter, the Atom, and one of my all-time favorites, Green Arrow. What would a successful debut look like? Right now, $60 million seems like all that we investors can hope for.
Yet that may not be good enough. According to The New York Times, Warner has spent close to $300 million producing and marketing Green Lantern. DC and Warner Bros. wouldn't spend that much if they didn't believe Ryan Reynolds' Emerald Knight would prove to be as attractive to this summer's moviegoers as Robert Downey Jr.'s Golden Avenger was in 2008.
Will the ploy pay off? You tell us. Please vote in the poll below, and then leave a comment to tell us what you think of superhero summer. Will it prove profitable for entertainment investors?
Fool contributor Tim Beyers owns an untold number of comic books and still reads his favorites digitally. He's also a member of the Motley Fool Rule Breakers stock-picking team and owned shares of Time Warner and Walt Disney at the time of publication. Check out Tim's portfolio holdings and Foolish writings, or connect with him on Twitter as @milehighfool. You can also get his insights delivered directly to your RSS reader.
Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Walt Disney. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
More from The Motley Fool
Why 2017 Was a Year to Remember for The Walt Disney Company
In the future, Disney investors will look back on 2017 as a year of game-changing importance.
Dueling Analysts Debate Netflix, Inc.'s Fourth Quarter
Both the bull and the bear might be mostly right -- they just disagree on what matters most.
Don't Buy the Hype. Star Wars: The Last Jedi Isn't an Epic Fail
There has been a lot of controversy in the media about the success or failure of the latest installment in the Star Wars saga. Let's look at the numbers.