Barring a few institutions that kept their balance sheets healthy and their noses clean during the run-up to the financial crisis, most of America's big banks have spent the past few years struggling to regain their financial footing, salvage the confidence of investors, and return to some sense of normality. For investors, normality means a return to generous dividends and share buybacks.
The Federal Reserve just released the results of its latest round of bank "stress tests." And for some banks, that return to normality is finally at hand. For others, it's back to the balance sheets. Here's a recap of events, along with the two banks expected to increase their dividends the most.
The beneficial kind of stress
At the height of the financial crisis, the entire U.S. banking system seemed on the verge of collapse. Overleveraging, convoluted trading and securitizations, and an ocean of ill-advised subprime lending left a number of major American banks overexposed, undercapitalized, and in danger of bankruptcy. The investment bank Lehman Brothers did, in fact, go bankrupt. Others were saved only with hastily arranged buyouts by more solvent banks and a mountainous infusion of money from the federal government.
As the banks have slowly recapitalized and repaired their balance sheets, the Federal Reserve has periodically run them through tests simulating how they would hold up in the event of another crisis. In this month's test, the worst-case scenario included a 50% decline in the stock market, 13% unemployment, an 8% drop in gross domestic product, low interest rates, and a European market crisis. Under these simulated conditions, banks had to show they could maintain a core, Tier 1 capital ratio above 5% of risk-weighted assets.
The stress-test process is analogous to having a doctor put a patient on a treadmill, wire him up, and then monitor his biological responses as the pace is increased. So how did the "patients" do?
Run, fat boy, run
Four out of the 19 banks failed their stress tests, and of those four, the most surprising was Citigroup's
And having wisely averted many of the temptations other big American banks fell prey to, Wells Fargo
Bank of America
Please do not feed the banks
Banks are hungry to raise their dividends or buy back shares -- anything to create shareholder value and get their share prices out of the ditch. But no matter what the dividend yield is, many of these large banks must still be approached with extreme caution.
While passed off by the Federal Reserve and complained about by the banks themselves as stringent, these stress tests were, I think, more of a minimum passing grade to get back out into the real world. Balance sheets are still by no means perfect, and there a lot of mortgages out there ready to go into default, which could potentially undo all the work that's been done to pass the stress tests. Even Morgan Stanley's CEO, James Gorman, said: "All investors should care about is did we pass. A couple of years ago very few banks could have passed."
My personal favorite of the big banks, by far, is Wells Fargo, which really kept its head on straight throughout the 2000s and has a well-deserved reputation for being a steady-Eddie, traditional bank (as least as traditional as big banks come these days). As for all the others, do your due diligence. In that spirit, learn about some delightfully straightforward bank stocks, including one Warren Buffett could have loved in his earlier years, in our free report, "The Stocks Only the Smartest Investors Are Buying." Download your copy while it's still available and the stocks are hot.
Fool contributor John Grgurich is ready to go and buy some shares of Wells Fargo himself right now, but he currently owns no shares of it, nor of any other companies mentioned in this column. Follow John's dispatches from the front lines of capitalism on Twitter, @TMFGrgurich. Leave any hurtful or gracious comments about today's column in the comments section below. The Motley Fool owns shares of JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America and has created a covered strangle position in Wells Fargo. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a scintillating disclosure policy.
More from The Motley Fool
Better Stock: Wells Fargo (WFC) vs. Citigroup (C)
The two banks have had plenty of ups and downs over the last decade or so. Here's the one I think has more "up" potential right now.
These Bank Bets Put Even Bitcoin to Shame
Find out why you have less than a year left to use some of these unusual investments.
This Will Cost Corporate America Billions This Earnings Season
Find out why tax reform is a two-edged sword.