Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Why Shares of Boulder Brands Inc Tumbled Thursday

By Alex Dumortier, CFA – Feb 26, 2015 at 3:37PM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Boulder Brands disappoints with its top-line growth forecast.

Although we don't believe in timing the market or panicking over market movements, we do like to keep an eye on big changes -- just in case they're material to our investing thesis.

What: Shares of Boulder Brands (BDBD.DL) fell as much as 20% on Thursday (and were down about 11% as of 3:30 p.m.) after the consumer packaged foods company reported fourth-quarter revenue that fell short of Wall Street's expectations.

So what: If today's stock market reaction is anything to go by, investors are focusing squarely on the top line at Boulder Brands. Indeed, as the following table illustrates, the company's guidance for 2015 EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization -- a measure of cash flow) exceeded the consensus forecast while earnings-per-share guidance landed right in line with the projection. However, the company's outlook for revenue fell short of what analysts were projecting:

 

Q4 2014-Achieved

Consensus estimate

Revenue

$128.6 million

$134.1 million

Adjusted EPS*

$0.05

$0.05

 

2015 Guidance

 

Revenue

$550 million-$560 million

$577 million

Adjusted EBITDA

$78 million-$82 million

$73 million

Adjusted EPS

$0.25-$0.29

$0.27

Source: Zacks Investment Research, Thomson Financial Network, Boulder Brands.

Now what: A stock's intrinsic value is equal to the sum of discounted cash flow, not discounted revenue, so the market's focus on the top line might appear a bit myopic here. However, it does raise the question of Boulder Brands' long-term addressable market, which looks pretty narrow given its specialization in gluten-free foods. Commenting on Boulder Brands on CNBC today, the always vociferous Jim Cramer said organic foods look like a more attractive segment; for once, I'm inclined to agree with him.

Alex Dumortier, CFA has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.