Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Why These Outlandish AMD Buyout Rumors Seem False

By Ashraf Eassa - Sep 14, 2015 at 9:00AM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Another day, another outlandish AMD buyout rumor.

Back in late June, KitGuru reported that Microsoft (MSFT 1.12%) might be interested in acquiring struggling chip maker Advanced Micro Devices (AMD 1.63%). The author of the KitGuru piece suggested that Microsoft could be interested in AMD to save money on its game console chips and/or develop smartphone- and tablet-oriented chip solutions -- two arguments that I wrote at the time didn't hold water.

Now, according to a new report from Fudzilla -- which recently claimed that private-equity firm Silver Lake partners is about to buy 20% of AMD -- Microsoft is "seriously talking to AMD" about a buyout. In that same report, Fudzilla also said that its sources "suggest that Intel (INTC 1.27%) is interested in the acquisition of AMD."

Although anything is possible, I think that neither of these rumored acquisitions makes very much sense. Here's why.

Let's start with Intel first
There is a lot of overlap between AMD's and Intel's businesses. Both companies develop and sell processors into the PC market, and AMD has ambitions of once again becoming a viable provider of silicon into the server market, which Intel dominates.

If Intel were to buy AMD, it would essentially get a flailing discrete graphics chip business, a nearly nonexistent server processor business, a crumbling PC processor business (in no small part thanks to Intel), and a reasonably large -- but relatively low-margin -- semi-custom chip business, which is mostly a game console chip business.

One could reasonably argue that Intel could make good use of AMD's graphics processor technology, but I think Intel's organic graphics efforts have improved to the point where buying AMD wouldn't do the chip giant much good.

The only thing that seems as though it would be valuable to Intel would be AMD's CPU patent portfolio, which would include, among other things, the AMD64 instruction set extensions that Intel uses in its chips today.

However, even if Intel were interested in the AMD patent portfolio, it would probably make more sense for Intel to just buy the patents outright from AMD. Doing so would spare Intel from having to take on a business that's in poor shape and that overlaps heavily with its own offerings, and it would allow AMD to try once again to reinvent itself with the potential proceeds.

I think the odds that Intel outright buys AMD are practically nonexistent at this point.

What about Microsoft?
Although Microsoft has made some pretty questionable acquisitions in the past, I think the purchase of AMD would potentially rank among its most outlandish.

The argument that Microsoft would want AMD all to itself for Xbox chips doesn't make a whole lot of sense, but there are some other potential "synergies" that I've seen discussed that I think also don't hold water.

One that I've heard is that Microsoft might be interested in picking up AMD to build (semi) custom chips for its cloud infrastructure. If Microsoft wanted custom server parts from AMD, wouldn't it just make more sense for Microsoft to hire AMD to build such chips, as it did with the game consoles?

That said, it's hard to imagine that AMD would be Microsoft's first choice for such a job, especially since Intel -- which has time and again proved its capabilities in developing server platforms -- has also said that it will do custom chips for large enough customers. Microsoft, in this case, seems a "large enough" customer.

As to the rest of AMD -- which boils down to PC processors and discrete graphics chips -- I can't imagine that Microsoft would want AMD just for chips to power its Surface line of tablets. And also note that Intel's low-power solutions here have consistently been superior to anything AMD has been able to cook up.

I also don't think Microsoft would want to get into the standalone graphics-chip business, especially when it's trying to sell gamers on its Xbox platform.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Intel Corporation Stock Quote
Intel Corporation
INTC
$42.20 (1.27%) $0.53
Microsoft Corporation Stock Quote
Microsoft Corporation
MSFT
$262.52 (1.12%) $2.90
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Stock Quote
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
AMD
$92.65 (1.63%) $1.49

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning service.

Stock Advisor Returns
322%
 
S&P 500 Returns
116%

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 05/25/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.