This is your lucky day, dear reader, because if you hadn't happened upon this article today, your life might have unraveled in a most unfortunate way. You might have ... take a moment to gasp with me here ... invested in mutual funds!
As Shakespeare might have said, "Heaven forfend!"
I'm here to steer you straight -- away from dastardly mutual funds and toward more sensible investments. Such as ... well, I'll think of some soon. In the meantime, let me try to count the countless drawbacks of mutual funds.
If you invest in a mutual fund, you'll instantly be invested in, say, 50 to several hundred different stocks (or bonds, or what have you). Invest in a broad-market index fund, for example, such as one based on the S&P 500, and you'll own a stake in 500 of America's biggest companies, such as Genentech
That's nice, but an average of just 10% per year? Sure, that's more than the long-term average gains of bonds and real estate and lots of other things, but come on, you gorbellied, knotty-pated hugger-mugger -- that's playing it too safe! If you invest all your money in just one or two stocks, you might do much better than 10%. Intel
Some favor mutual funds because they allow trained professionals, some with sound ethics and deep insight, to invest your money for you. Well, I suppose that's fine -- if you're a fobbing, clay-brained measle. Don't you have any respect for yourself? Do you really need someone else to manage your money? I suppose you don't pull your own teeth, either, preferring to leave that to a "professional." And how hard is it, really, to rewire a house? Electrician shmelectrician.
OK, so mutual funds, at least the good ones, don't cost too much. Investing advisors can take 2% or more of your assets each year -- plus a share of your gains -- in exchange for their professional guidance. Some index funds charge less than 0.25%, while many well-managed mutual funds charge around 1% or less. If you wanted to buy 20 different companies on your own, it wouldn't be cost-effective to do so unless you had many thousands of dollars. But with mutual funds, you can spread as little as $1,000 or less over many companies.
This just reminds me of the option of putting all your money in one stock. Sure, it's risky, but it won't cost you much, relatively speaking. If you plunk your entire $50,000 investment into one stock, the brokerage commission might be just $10 or $25 or $50. That's peanuts. There's your low cost, you yeasty, bat-fowling coxcomb, you.
Oh, you just want to have your cake and eat it, too, don't you, you puking, ill-breeding canker-blossom? You want to be able to add to your investments regularly over time, without incurring copious commission fees? You like that you can regularly invest in a few mutual funds painlessly and inexpensively? Fine. Suit yourself, you droning, rude-growing pignut.
Again, my simple plan of putting it all in one stock makes dollar-cost averaging easy. Though, of course, if you're just plunking in $25 at a time and paying a $10 commission to do so, you're not doing yourself too many favors.
I know, you can cite other so-called advantages of mutual funds. They can make record-keeping easier, for example. They're very liquid, permitting you to cash out quickly, should you need to (as opposed to, say, real estate). There's a wide variety of funds available to choose from, including those that focus on companies by size, geographic region, industry, social responsibility, growth, or income. Go ahead and dwell on these if you want, you infectious, swag-bellied vassal.
And you, too, my Fool colleagues, you frothy, pox-marked gudgeons. Yes, you who write alongside me. I know that many of you look kindly on mutual funds. I know that we even launched a newsletter service several years ago dedicated to introducing investors to some "top-notch" mutual funds out there. I suppose there's some sense to that, since many weedy, half-faced mammets will still opt for mutual funds, no matter how much common sense I try to beat into them.
So go ahead, you beslubbering, flap-mouthed harpies. I invite you to sign up for a free trial of our Motley Fool Champion Funds newsletter, which offers regular fund recommendations monthly in an easy-to-digest format. Its picks are beating the market handily. A free trial gives you access to all past issues, so you can read about each recommendation in detail. You goatish, earth-vexing nut-hook.
This article was first published July 16, 2007. It has been updated.
Longtime Fool contributor Selena Maranjian owns shares of Amgen and Home Depot. She tapped the services of a Shakespearean insult generator for this article. Home Depot and Intel are Motley Fool Inside Value recommendations. The Motley Fool is Fools writing for Fools.
More from The Motley Fool
Is Canadian Solar Inc. a Buy?
Canadian Solar is one of the best-positioned companies to capitalize on solar industry growth in 2018.
Tax Losses Mask Johnson & Johnson's Fundamental Strength
Look beyond the bottom line to see where the healthcare giant succeeded the most.
Papa John’s CFO Delivers His Exit Announcement; Nestle Sells Its U.S. Candy Biz
The pizza-delivery chain’s management team looks increasingly rudderless, while the global food conglomerate will hardly miss its sweets segment here.