While preparing for his upcoming role as Achilles in the Warner Bros. film Troy, Brad Pitt gained the killer instinct of a warrior -- mostly because his training regimen was so difficult that he had to quit smoking. "The withdrawal was so hard that I was ready to kill," he said, "which was actually helpful for the role I was playing."
Hey, whatever it takes. If you're looking to kick the habit, join the legions of Fools on our Quitting Smoking discussion board for a supportive community and tips on how to beat the addiction.
In today's Motley Fool Take:
- Coke Pours a Strong One
- Shameless Plug: Broker Center
- Eastman Kodak Snaps to It
- Discussion Board of the Day: Photography
- Is Sears Underdressed?
- Quote of Note
- More on Fool.com Today
Coke Pours a Strong One
By Steven Mallas
Profits for the beverage company went up by 35%, good for a net take of $1.13 billion, which comes out to $0.46 per share. Other highlights for the latest quarter include an increase in free cash flow to $990 million from $404 million in the prior year's quarter, and a stock repurchase valued at $486 million.
The beverage business seems to be booming, as PepsiCo
This has been an interesting week for Coca-Cola. On Monday, the stock reached a 52-week high of $53.50 during intraday trading on speculation that Gillette
The company also announced an important new product -- a version of its soda with fewer carbohydrates. It's hoped this will capture the dollars available in the diet-conscious market. New products are key to long-term growth, as performance of the core Coca-Cola brand has been muted in the last few years. In fact, North American results seemed to be primarily driven by growth in the non-cola section of the portfolio, by products such as Powerade and Dasani.
For patient Coke shareholders, this latest report is welcome news. The company's fortunes are improving, and while it may be quite a long time before we see a share price almost equal to $90 -- as was observed in the late '90s -- at least Coke seems to be performing well.
However, the executives in Atlanta need to pump up the North American markets, and we need to see better marketing initiatives for the core brands (as discussed previously). Coke isn't out of the woods yet, but still, it's one heck of a blue chip with a powerful ability to generate cash for dividends.
Fool contributor Steven Mallas owns shares of Coca-Cola.
If you want to buy stocks, you're going to need a broker. And who wouldn't want to own stocks? There is no place over the past 100 years where your long-term savings would have fared better than the stock market -- not in bonds, not in real estate, not in gold, and certainly not in Beanie Babies. Our Broker Center makes it super-easy to pick the right broker for you, so check it out!
Eastman Kodak Snaps to It
By Alyce Lomax (TMF Lomax)
Smiles, everyone, smiles! Eastman Kodak
Kodak's first-quarter earnings came in at $28 million, or $0.10 per share, compared to $12 million, or $0.04 per share last year. If you remove the effects of onetime charges for cost-cutting and other items, the earnings were $74 million, or $0.26 per share. Get ready though, because operational earnings, which don't include a tax benefit among other items, were $0.18 per share. In a vote of confidence for the year to come, Kodak raised its 2004 estimates to the $2.15-to-$2.45 range from $2.05 to $2.35.
It's a nice change after some tough times. After all, Kodak is so well-known for those golden boxes, containing those once-ubiquitous film canisters that littered your vacation luggage. Digital photography is the new revolution, where you have the ability to ditch dog shots (not to be confused with shots of cute dogs) and store, even email, the good memories (with any luck, chosen carefully so nobody looks fat) to friends and family.
And that's where today's earnings shine. Sales increased 11% to $2.92 billion. Traditional sales sank a mere 2% -- not so precipitous, considering the sea of change to digital -- while digital revenues jumped 44%. One might wonder how Kodak might fare in the short term, now that the graduation, prom, and wedding seasons are upon us, and more and more people are going digital. In the long term, though, the challenge will be to monetize the digital age (check out Foolish colleague Rick Munarriz's recent theory here). After all, Kodak's traditional business, heavy on film, fits the adage that the real sweet spot is in selling the blades, not the razors.
Though the numbers gave reason for some optimism, Kodak still faces its share of difficulties. It's still cutting costs and hacking at areas with slow growth. It's embroiled in patent litigation with No. 1 rival Sony
Trading at about 11 times forward earnings, it may be worth taking a closer look at Kodak, given hints that it's not going to hang on the wrong side of the digital divide after all. But there are still obvious risks built in to its transition to the future.
Alyce Lomax does not own shares of any of the companies mentioned. She thinks digital cameras are super-cool, but had a bad run-in with one last summer ("I don't really look like that, do I???").
Are you a photography buff? Have you made the switch to digital or are you still relying on film and development? Talk to other Fools on the Photography discussion board.
Is Sears Underdressed?
By Alyce Lomax (TMF Lomax)
Sears shed its credit card operation by selling it to Citigroup
Although the sale of the credit card operation has allowed Sears to continue to hack its debt to $3.5 billion (down from $5.3 billion in January), there are still signs that the core business isn't yet up to speed. Today's results included a 14% drop in sales, to $7.8 million. While many of its home lines are doing well, there's still trouble with apparel.
Sears' valiant efforts in that department have been noted. The company has tried to revamp shoppers' perceptions through acquisitions of brands like Lands' End and Structure. However, despite the obvious pent-up demand for clothes so far this year -- bringing good times to many retailers -- it's a boat Sears appears to have missed.
The retailer admitted it failed to get winter merchandise off the floor, and ordered smaller amounts of spring apparel than met demand. So, it appears demand -- a question of late, at Sears -- might have been there, had the company ordered the appropriate amount of merchandise.
Meanwhile, past observations on Sears have garnered a lot of reader feedback about customer-service disappointments in its stores. You can upscale your brands, but if service stinks, watch once-loyal customers turn disloyal. There are lots of other options, including Wal-Mart
Despite the shaky start, Sears sees a better 2004 ahead. But lackluster sales don't bode well for Sears. It seems there's still work to be done in mastering the art of selling apparel.
Alyce Lomax does not own shares of any of the companies mentioned.
"Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please." -- Mark Twain
Robert Brokamp's got a quick, fun way of finding out how much you and your better half agree about money. Check out The Fooly-Wed Game.... Ever heard of structural free cash flow? It's one of Tom Gardner's main tools for digging up Hidden Gems. Rex Moore explains all in Measuring True Profitability.... Don't know much about the ins and outs of shareholder lawsuits? Bill Mann's got the skinny in Attack of the Killer Attorneys.... Want to know what's worth buying in downbeat big pharma? Ben McClure breaks it down in Discount Pharmacy.
In other news:
- Sirius' Earnings Disappoint
- Buying on the Boss' Tab
- RadioShack at the Crossroads
- Cheesecake's Rich Results
For a list of all our stories from today, see our Today's Headlines page.