In the second year, sales and earnings growth percentages for the European business are 50% and 37.5%, respectively, in the local currency. Translating those values to U.S. dollars with slightly different exchange rates alters the growth percentages to 51.5% and 39%. That may not seem like much, but the effect is compounded when translating multiple currencies, particularly if less-stable economies are in play.
There are different ways to implement constant currency reporting. A fixed exchange rate could be used each year, for example. Alternatively, prior-period numbers could be recast to match the average exchange rate for the current year.
Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) do not allow businesses to report exclusively in constant currency. However, many businesses will provide constant currency metrics alongside their GAAP financial statements.
Advantages of constant currency reporting
Comparability is the primary advantage of constant currency reporting. Stripping away the exchange rate effect allows for more meaningful, reliable comparisons between periods.
A net income increase of 50% on a constant currency basis, for example, is usually a positive result. On the other hand, 50% net income growth based on unadjusted numbers with no clarification of the currency effect is less definitive.
Advocates of constant currency reporting also argue that exchange rates are outside the control of business leaders, so results that exclude currency fluctuations provide more transparency into underlying business performance.