Pull out your black-ink pens, Borders
Wall Street Wisdom:
- General consensus. The nine analysts watching Borders are cautiously optimistic about the company. While seven of them still rate the stock a hold, two venture forth with buy ratings.
- Revenues. Analysts believe that Q4 2005 sales bested Q4 2004's numbers by 3.4%. $1.42 billion is the target.
- Earnings. Profits are expected to do twice as well tomorrow. Wall Street is looking for an 8.6% improvement, to $1.76 per share.
Margin watch:
Borders has never been known for its huge profit margins, but 2005 was a worse year than usual. Borders' net, currently at 2.6% on a rolling basis, hasn't been this low since 2002.
Margins % |
7/04 |
10/04 |
1/05 |
4/05 |
7/05 |
10/05 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross |
28 |
28.1 |
28.2 |
28.2 |
28 |
27.6 |
Op. |
5.9 |
5.8 |
5.7 |
5.4 |
5.1 |
4.6 |
Net |
3.3 |
3.2 |
3.4 |
3.2 |
3 |
2.6 |
Foolish lookout:
What's behind the margin slide? If you flip back through the SEC filings to find Borders' last earnings release, you'll see that the company twice blamed the unusual culprit "de-leveraging" for both gross and operating margin deterioration. What does that mean? My guess is that Borders is saying: "We're a big chain. If we sell lots of books, our size helps us to expand margins. If we sell fewer books, but pay the same fixed costs to remain a big chain, our margins contract."
Seems logical. Basically, if Borders wants to turn its business around, it needs to get sales growing faster than the 2.4% per annum that it's managed year-to-date. Faster sales growth will help it "leverage" its size and keep more of those sales dollars as profits. In that regard, tomorrow's expected 3.4% sales increase would be a step in the right direction.
I'd also suggest that you keep an eye on the company's balance sheet tomorrow. With sales growth in the ultra-low single digits, you don't want to keep seeing inventory increases of 10% and 5%, as we saw in the last two quarters. If inventories do keep growing faster than sales, the company will eventually have to unload the merchandise at discount prices -- which could undo any good that better sales might accomplish.
Fool contributor Rich Smith has no interest, short or long, in any company named above.