Gap
Fourth-quarter net income decreased 8.3% to $243 million, or $0.34 per share. Revenue fell 12.8% to $4.1 billion, and same-store sales plunged 14%. Same-store sales were weak across all three of its concepts, and as usual, Old Navy fared the worst, with a 17% plunge. Even the Banana Republic chain, which has often been a bright spot, saw its comps decrease almost as badly, falling 15%.
Gap was able to make up for the weak sales by cutting costs and controlling inventories. In addition, it was able to generate $981 million in free cash flow for the year, and it still has $1.8 billion in cash. While I'm not particularly high on Gap stock, I do admit that its cash position gives it a survivalist edge in the currently tough retail environment. That said, Gap's seemingly continual necessity to cut costs, even as it can't seem to increase sales, doesn't exactly champion the business's growth possibilities.
I have a hard time seeing exactly what different or interesting qualities Gap brings to the table. It doesn't really stand out against rivals such as American Eagle Outfitters
Gap's continued weakness seems destined to worsen further in our serious recession. I find retailers like Aeropostale and The Buckle
Like I said, Gap's cash cushion does give it a nice safety net while the retail landscape gets ravaged, allowing it to stay alive as weaker, more debt-laden retailers get weeded out. On the other hand, I don't see many growth opportunities for investors here, since Gap is still struggling to boost sales. I believe its brand saw better days long ago, and will never recover its former glory. I still think it's a good idea for investors to steer clear of Gap.
Shop around for some related Foolishness:
- Retail and consumer goods companies are experiencing a luxury freefall.
- Target illustrates the discount dichotomy.
- Here's a retail play for 2009.