You don't need to look too far to bump into pessimism.
Remember the recovery in the housing industry? We're still waiting on that one. Real estate portal Zillow.com is reporting that home sale prices fell 3% during the first quarter, off by more than 8% over the past year. According to Zillow, real estate prices have dipped for 57 consecutive months.
That's a nasty streak, unless you happen to be in the market for a new home without one to sell.
It gets worse.
There are still plenty of companies posting lower earnings than they did a year ago. Let's go over a few of the names that are expected to go the wrong way on the bottom line next week.
|Company||Latest Quarter EPS (Estimated)||Year-Ago Quarter EPS||My Watchlist|
Source: Thomson Reuters.
Clearing the table
There will likely be more companies posting lower earnings next week; these are just a few of the names that really jump out at me.
Let's start with Winn-Dixie Stores. The southeastern grocer emerged from bankruptcy protection five years ago with a sparkling balance sheet and free of its more cumbersome leases. Has the 484-unit supermarket chain earned its second chance? It hasn't been so hot lately, trading in the single digits since last summer.
Urban Outfitters, Aeropostale, and Gap are three of the better-known mall store chains, aiming to dress up teens and hipster adults with trendy duds. Gap's Old Navy chain may aim for a different target audience of penny-pinching families, but all three retailers aren't bouncing back the way they were supposed to once the recession came and went.
There are a ton of specialty retailers posting their fiscal-first-quarter results, so the bottom-line weakness at Urban Outfitters, Aeropostale, and Gap isn't a universal cause for alarm. Most of the apparel retailers and particularly the department store chains are slated to post healthy year-over-year improvement. The problems at Urban Outfitters, Aeropostale, and Gap are therefore concept-specific.
If Wall Street's right, all three companies will have a lot of explaining to do next week.
Brocade has been stuck with its single-digit share price for even longer than Winn-Dixie. You would have to go back four years to find the last time that the networking solutions provider was trading in the double digits. This should be Brocade's third straight quarter of posting year-over-year declines on the bottom line.
When the cloud-computing revolution was getting started, salesforce.com was the willing poster child. Companies turned to salesforce.com for cheaper Web-stored enterprise software than traditional business platforms.
Fellow Fool Tim Beyers was concerned with the largesse of salesforce.com's option-granting expenses during its most recent quarter. This won't be the culprit behind the projected dip in profitability come Thursday. Analysts back out the impact of options in drumming up their guesstimates. In fact, salesforce.com's guidance calls for a small quarterly loss on a reported basis.
Finally, we have Sears. The company behind the Sears and Kmart department store chains has come a long way since its darling days as a mail-order wonder -- and that isn't a good thing. Sears has been posting negative comps for years, and it's unlikely that the Kardashian sisters can come to the rescue. Losses are turning into steeper losses during the seasonal lulls outside of Christmas.
Sears Holdings hasn't cratered as an investment because of the lofty values of its underlying real estate, but maybe bulls want to rethink that position after reviewing Zillow's painful data.
Why the long face, short-seller?
These seven companies have seen better days. The market has rewarded many of these stocks with reasonable gains over the past year, but they still haven't earned those upticks.
The good news here is that Wall Street already expects these companies to deliver shrinking bottom lines. In other words, the bad news is already baked into the shares.
The more I think about it, the less worried I become.
Please take our Motley Poll, then scroll down to leave a comment explaining your vote.