The report in question, a redacted version made public Monday, basically shot holes in all the rationales AT&T had advanced that the merger would be in the public interest:
|Would not be anticompetitive.||"... raises significant competitive concerns ..." and "... material questions of fact ..."|
|Would lower wireless prices.||"... their claim that the proposed transaction would result in lower wireless industry prices is flawed ..."|
|Would create synergies that would lower costs.||"[If synergies are realized] ... would likely result in reduced service quality."|
|Would create 96,000 new jobs.||"We cannot find that the transaction would lead to a net increase in U.S.-based jobs."|
Here are some excerpts from AT&T's statement in response to the FCC, which will give the general tenor of the company's concern:
- "The document is so obviously one-sided that any fair-minded person reading it is left with the clear impression that it is an advocacy piece ..."
- "In our view, the report raises questions as to whether its authors were predisposed."
- "This is clearly not the fair and objective analysis to which any party is entitled, and which we have every right to expect."
- "We believe that the utter absence of balance is clear, and demonstrates that the document lacks all credibility."
A steep climb for merger-hood
Even before the FCC's scathing appraisal was released, the merger seemed doomed. Last August, the Department of Justice filed an antitrust lawsuit against the proposal, and earlier this month the FCC chairman proposed putting the application before an administrative hearing. That latter action caused AT&T to hurriedly withdraw the application from the FCC – early Thanksgiving morning, no less.
Then the report came out. The FCC said it released it for transparency's sake. AT&T obviously thinks differently.
The merger proposal does raise anticompetitive issues. It would create a duopoly of AT&T and Verizon
To counter those concerns, and to try and placate the Department of Justice enough to settle its case, AT&T has been attempting deals with other carriers to take some of T-Mobile's customer accounts and wireless spectrum. Leap
AT&T works in mysterious ways
AT&T has made a serious callout to the FCC, still one of the entities (the DOJ is the other) whose approval it would need to go through with any wireless marriage. Does that mean the company is throwing up its hands in frustration -- or is this some kind of strategy that we, as ordinary mortals, fail to grasp?
Want to keep up with AT&T? Just put the company on the Fool's My Watchlist:
- Add AT&T to My Watchlist.
Fool contributor Dan Radovsky owns shares of AT&T. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.