Based on the aggregated intelligence of 180,000-plus investors participating in Motley Fool CAPS, the Fool's free investing community, uranium producer Cameco
With that in mind, let's take a closer look at Cameco's business and see what CAPS investors are saying about the stock right now.
|Headquarters (founded)||Saskatoon, Canada (1987)|
|Market Cap||$8.6 billion|
|Industry||Industrial metals and minerals|
|Trailing-12-Month Revenue||$2.5 billion|
|Management||CEO Timothy Gitzel (since 2011)
CFO Grant Isaac (since 2011)
|Return on Equity (average, past 3 years)||9.7%|
|Cash/Debt||$903.6 million / $1.0 billion|
Sources: S&P Capital IQ and Motley Fool CAPS.
On CAPS, 98% of the 1,840 members who have rated Cameco believe the stock will outperform the S&P 500 going forward.
This company is the primary stake holder in the Cigar Lake Mine, which is the one of the largest holds of Uranium in the world. Mining is supposed to begin in 2013, when it does I can only see this stock continue to rise. Also the whole issue with negative nuclear press from Japan has somewhat blown over, which again is only good for Uranium.
If you want market-thumping returns, you need to put together the best portfolio you can. Owning exceptional stocks is a surefire way to secure your financial future. Of course, despite its five-star rating, Cameco may not be your top choice.
If that's the case, we've compiled a special free report for investors called "The Tiny Gold Stock Digging Up Massive Profits," which uncovers another commodity play with big potential. The report is 100% free, but it won't be around forever, so click here to access it now.
Want to see how well (or not so well) the stocks in this series are performing? Follow the TrackPoisedTo CAPS account.
More from The Motley Fool
Uranium Stocks: What to Watch in 2018
Investors in uranium stocks can look forward to better days ahead.
Will 2018 Be Cameco Corporation's Best Year Yet?
A lot depends on the uranium market.
Should You Be Worried About Cameco Corp Stock's 11.8% Drop in 2017?
Why the uranium miner struggled in 2017, and what its response could mean for 2018.