Awesome -- here are some more ways we can screw up our economy.
When I heard about the “buy American” provisions in the stimulus package that is moving through Congress, my immediate thought was, “Oh no.”
It’s just one more example of the increasing trend of government trying to plan and control our economic destiny, and the danger of badly botching things looms.
Proud to be an American
Of course the “buy American” ethos seems quite pleasant and solidly patriotic. Trust that many companies have known that for ages, and it’s not too hard to summon your inner cynic when you think of some companies’ marketing campaigns.
Remember the old days of Sam Walton’s Wal-Mart
I have no problem with “buying American” as a voluntary choice. On the consumer side, if you want to support American-made products, by all means, please do (although admittedly, it gets harder all the time). I often try to do it myself. You will probably pay more, but paying more to support industry in your own country is one of those interesting, even arguably a bit “irrational,” economic decisions consumers make all the time.
What we do with our money might not be as cut-and-dry as simply wanting to pay the cheapest price possible, which certainly makes the study of economics a lot more interesting and complex. I suppose that’s why behavioral economics is fascinating.
Many of our industries have gone overseas for cheap labor and materials, but if consumers direct their dollars in a “buy American” way, these industries may have to rethink their strategies.
For example, ever since scandals regarding Chinese production of things like toys and pet food hit, some consumers started to think twice about country-of-origin labels. Industries must adjust. Look at what Mattel went through last year as it had to issue recall after recall of toys with unacceptable lead content. American parents surely weren’t pleased.
Here come the zombies
Clearly I am no fan of central planning or coercion. That’s why “buy American” as official economic policy strikes me as dangerous. When I wrote about the possibility of a coming economic zombie apocalypse, this sort of thing was on the table as yet another example of artificially propping up noncompetitive companies.
The steel industry was already among those reportedly hoping for a shot in the arm from government stimulus programs as business has plummeted; U.S. Steel apparently lobbied accordingly. The stimulus package that is currently working its way through Congress has a provision that prohibits the purchase of foreign steel or iron for any infrastructure spending that gets government funding through the program. A Senate version adds that any stimulus-funded projects use all American-made materials. Interestingly, General Electric
Of course this brings to mind protectionism, and also the idea that foreign governments may retaliate by not playing nice with us. As it is, the EU is already reacting with discomfort. And when it comes to China, regardless of how you feel about our trade with that country, we also must remember it is a major U.S. creditor and the fact is, our government has been borrowing heavily.
Meanwhile, many people are bringing up what may be a very salient point since we’ve all been thinking a lot about the Great Depression lately, and that is that protectionism during that time frame helped make the Great Depression so great (in a bad way).
Also note that President Obama acknowledged the dangers of any signals of protectionism, and that he is aware of the possibility of damaging trade wars. We can take some measure of relief that he seems aware of the possible damaging consequences, despite the fact that his own party is pushing for the provisions.
When losers win
Any kind of required favoritism or preferential treatment for some companies or entities over others is far from a free-market policy, and the economic ramifications over the long haul are frightening when you think of how out of whack everything could get when business decision-making is so skewed by random variables.
In keeping with our ill-conceived bailouts of financial institutions, the “buy American” provisions would mean government is once again picking winners and losers and further firing up moral hazard issues. On a very elementary level, I feel this is simply anticompetitive; it could also be another con game in the making. After all, corporate lobbying badly mucks up competition, too.
When it comes to our economic health, a planned economy that picks winners while ignoring economic reality and true competition probably means we’ll all be losers in the end. It’s kind of hard to be patriotic if there is little left to be patriotic about.