Scottish philosopher David Hume later summed up the “black swan problem” by saying, “No amount of observations of white swans can allow the inference that all swans are white, but the observation of a single black swan is sufficient to refute that conclusion.”
Later, writer, statistician, and former options trader Nassim Nicholas Taleb popularized the concept of the black swan event in his books Fooled by Randomness and The Black Swan. In The Black Swan, Taleb outlines three criteria for a black swan event:
- It’s an outlier. Nothing in the past suggests that such an event was possible.
- It has an extreme impact.
- Humans concoct explanations in retrospect for why the event was predictable and explainable.
The final point is key because what we don’t know is far more important than what we do know, at least when it comes to black swan logic. For example, the 9/11 terror attacks were a highly improbable event whose seismic impacts were felt across the globe. Yet, after the attacks, countless experts claimed that intelligence communities should have been able to predict the attacks.
Taleb experienced his first black swan event during his adolescence when his once-peaceful homeland of Lebanon plunged into civil war. But it wasn’t until he profited enormously from the Black Monday stock market crash of 1987 -- an event that shocked Taleb, as well as the entire investment world -- that he developed the black swan concept.
Taleb argues that the world is far more random than we realize. The big, unpredictable events are the ones that shape the world. By their very nature, however, they’re impossible to forecast. The problem is less about our inability to predict these outlier events than “our blindness with respect to randomness.”
While the term “black swan event” often carries a negative connotation, some black swan events are actually positive. The rise of the internet is one example of a black swan event that has changed the world for the better.