At The Motley Fool, we poke plenty of fun at Wall Street analysts and their endless cycle of upgrades, downgrades, and "initiating coverage at neutral." Today, we'll show you whether those bigwigs actually know what they're talking about. To help, we've enlisted Motley Fool CAPS to track the long-term performance of Wall Street's best and worst.
Is AMD an A-plus?
Is now the time for AMD
All of which may be true, but are these reasons enough to justify buying AMD? UBS talks a good game, but how accurate have its guesses proven in the past? Sadly, not very.
Let's go to the tape
UBS spends a lot of time studying the semiconductor industry -- its third-largest area of coverage by number of picks made -- but so far it's been no better than a C student here. Five years of tracking the banker's performance has shown us that, while UBS occasionally hits it out of the park, on average, its semiconductor picks outperform the market only about 45% of the time:
UBS Picks Beating (Lagging) S&P by
||Underperform||****||(45 points) (picked twice^)|
Source: Motley Fool CAPS.
^Previous NVIDIA pick was an outperform call; current pick is underperform.
While brilliant picks such as Skyworks have certainly helped boost UBS' reputation, its broader record of semiconductor underperformance doesn't lend much confidence that the banker is right about AMD today. Nor, I fear, do UBS' arguments in favor of AMD.
Take UBS' assertion that AMD is cheap at nine times forward earnings, for example. First off, AMD currently sells for less than six times trailing earnings. If its forward P/E is nine, that means earnings will be going down in the near future -- especially as the effect of the company's settlement with Samsung stops boosting its backward-looking bottom line. (In contrast, Intel's 10.5 trailing P/E compares to a forward ratio of 9.3 -- meaning its earnings are growing.)
It's also worth pointing out that AMD's P/E is something of an accounting fiction. While reported earnings of $828 million for the past 12 months certainly seem robust, AMD's free cash flow for the period was actually -$505 million. The company's not generating cash; it's burning it.
Trinity: Three times nothing equals ...?
As for the new Trinity chip, it certainly sounds promising. But AMD faces stiff competition in mobile semiconductors from the likes of ARM
At six times earnings, and a projected 11% growth rate, AMD shares are certain to attract bargain hunters. But fighting for share in a crowded market, and hampered by a history of weak cash production, I can't shake the feeling that AMD is more value trap than value, period. My advice: Stay away. There are better ways to make money in semiconductors today. I stumbled across two earlier this month. Read about them here.
Still like AMD's chances? Think UBS might be onto something, Rich's reservations notwithstanding? Add AMD to your Fool watchlist to see who's right.
Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own shares of any company named above. You can find him on CAPS, publicly pontificating under the handle TMFDitty, where he's currently ranked No. 296 out of more than 180,000 members. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool owns shares of Applied Materials, Intel, and Qualcomm, and has bought calls on Intel. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of NVIDIA and Intel, writing puts on NVIDIA, and creating a diagonal call position on Intel.
We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.