Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Will NASA and Lockheed Martin Reinvent the Concorde Jet?

By Rich Smith – Mar 12, 2016 at 10:13AM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

Sonic booms could become a thing of the past -- and Mach speed air travel the thing of the future.

Artist's conception of what a 21st Century "Concorde" jet might look like. Image source: NASA.

Developed by Aerospatiale and British Aircraft Corporation in 1969, the Concorde jet was a wonder of 20th Century aeronautical engineering. Capable of carrying as many as 128 passengers at speeds in excess of Mach 2, a Concorde jet could make the run from JFK to London, Heathrow in under three hours. Air France and British Airways, which operated the jet, retired it from service in 2003 -- and there hasn't been a commercial supersonic plane in regular service since.

Until now.


NASA goes on a QueSST
Last week, in an announcement that promises to shake up the airways -- and the airlines that fly them -- the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (yes, NASA) announced the first in a series of contracts that it's awarding to private businesses interested in upgrading the entire concept of air travel.

The award in question, which goes to Lockheed Martin (LMT 0.50%), grants the nation's biggest contractor $20 million to design a new supersonic civilian passenger jet. After screening several proposals on the Quiet Super-Sonic Technology (QueSST) project, NASA decided that Lockheed Martin has the best idea for building a new supersonic jet capable of flying at Mach speeds without creating the telltale "sonic booms" that helped make Concorde so unpopular with people on the ground.

What's a "sonic boom"?
Civilian supersonic flight over the U.S. has been banned by the Federal Aviation Administration since 1973 -- so many U.S. readers may have forgotten how much of a nuisance sonic booms can be. Here's how it works, in a nutshell.

The sound produced by an airplane's engines travels at the speed of sound (naturally). When an airplane travels faster than the sound its own engines create, however, the soundwaves it emits are continuously catching up with each other, compressing, and creating a ripple of noise (and vibration -- sonic booms used to be blamed for causing actual structural damage to buildings) that reverberates on the ground in the plane's wake.

NASA's QueSST project seeks to design a plane that can fly at supersonic speeds but produce no more than a series of soft thumps resembling a "heartbeat," when heard from the ground. NASA is hiring Lockheed Martin, in cooperation with engine-maker General Electric (GE 0.31%) and privately held Tri Models of Huntington Beach, Calif., to work up "baseline aircraft requirements and a preliminary aircraft design, with specifications" for such a "low boom" supersonic jet.

Assuming everything looks good, Lockheed Martin would then be given the go-ahead to build a half-scale version of a full-size civilian QueSST aircraft, run it through wind tunnel tests, and then eventually test-fly the aircraft.

What it means to investors
Rome wasn't built in a day, and designing an entirely novel aircraft isn't something that will happen immediately either. It took Lockheed Martin took nearly 20 years to take its F-22 stealth fighter jet from concept to introduction into the Air Force, for example. That said, NASA has set a pretty ambitious timetable for QueSST, and hopes to test a prototype low-boom supersonic jet by 2020.

$20 million is just .04% of Lockheed's $46 billion annual revenue stream. The speed at which NASA plans to move, however, suggests that this contract, which is currently pretty minuscule by Lockheed Martin standards, could quickly turn into a project capable of "moving the needle" even on a business as big as Lockheed's. (If General Electric's engines are key to the design, that could be good news for GE as well.)

Given Lockheed Martin's demonstrated interest in diversifying its business away from the shrinking U.S. defense budget -- moving into green energy, and into civilian market planes -- this is an opportunity we'd expect to see Lockheed Martin pursue aggressively, even if it takes a few years to play out.

Trust that we'll be watching, and that we'll keep you informed as the story develops.

Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own shares of, nor is he short, any company named above. You can find him on Motley Fool CAPS, publicly pontificating under the handle TMFDitty, where he's currently ranked No. 282 out of more than 75,000 rated members.

The Motley Fool owns shares of General Electric Company. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

General Electric Stock Quote
General Electric
$88.14 (0.31%) $0.27
Lockheed Martin Stock Quote
Lockheed Martin
$483.46 (0.50%) $2.39

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
S&P 500 Returns

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 11/28/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.