Nash equilibrium vs. dominant strategy
It's easy to get confused in game theory because so many of the components sound a lot alike. There are several different concepts that describe types of strategies, including the Nash equilibrium and dominant strategy.
Nash equilibrium, as discussed above, is the balance achieved when all players have a stable strategy and pursue it to the end. It's not really a strategy but a way of understanding how strategies can interact in a perfect system.
Dominant strategy is the best strategy possible regardless of how the other players act. So, you could have a dominant strategy within a Nash equilibrium, in that one strategy plays out much better than others, but it's not necessary for Nash equilibrium or game theory.
How does game theory apply to investing?
Although investing is far from a game, game theory is often used in it, whether we realize it or not. In its most basic form, game theory is all about making decisions. Do we invest in an exchange-traded fund, or do we comb the value stocks for one that's potentially explosive? Do we buy and hold for a long-term investing timeline, or do we day trade our way to retirement?
Even though there are no directly observable conflicts between investors, very visible conflicts happen all the time between businesses and their positions in the marketplace. We use that information to help position ourselves as stock investors, or we choose to sit out as investors in other types of securities, like bonds.
Related investing topics