Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

The Streaming Skinny Cable Bundle Isn't Dying, It's Just Under New Ownership

By James Brumley – May 13, 2020 at 7:45AM

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More

The cable TV industry's old powerhouses aren't all that relevant in the arena, but consumers are willing to pay for the right live package.

It was supposed to be the cable television industry's answer to the advent of much cheaper streaming options. Consumers may be increasingly unwilling to pay full price for a full-blown cable TV service. But they might pay a lower price for a more modest channel lineup of live television options, regardless of how it's delivered.

That's not quite how things have panned out, though. Instead, a couple of unlikely providers have become the leading names within this sliver of the cable market -- at the expense of the players that arguably should be winning the race. Namely, Alphabet's (GOOG -1.98%) (GOOGL -1.82%) YouTube TV and Walt Disney's (DIS -3.20%) Hulu Live TV have proven there's interest in a more modest cable package. The trick is simply being able to sell it.

Mixed quarter for vMVPDs

On the whole, virtual multi-video program distributors -- or vMVPDs -- such as Sling TV and Hulu's Live TV fared about as badly as linear cable television providers did during the first quarter. MoffettNathanson Research's Craig Moffett estimates that vMVPDs lost 341,000 subscribers in the three-month stretch, versus conventional cable's customer attrition of 1.8 million.

Someone pointing a remote control at a TV, choosing a streaming channel

Image source: Getty Images.

Moffett's data jibes with company reports. Dish Network's (DISH -2.19%) Sling TV lost 281,000 of its 2.59 million customers it served as of the end of 2019. AT&T's (T -1.22%) skinny bundle AT&T TV Now lost 138,000 of its over-the-top television subscribers, compared to nearly 900,000 traditional cable customers losses.

It's only anecdotal evidence, and the number of cancellations isn't huge. But, for a sliver of the TV market that was never that big to begin with, those customer losses are relatively large.

There are a couple of curious footnotes to add to the analysis, however.

Chief among them is the fact that of the 341,000 total vMVPD users who simply went away last quarter, a huge chunk of them were the roughly 500,000 subscribers to Sony's Vue bundle that ceased service at the end of January. Moffett doesn't believe many (if any) of them signed up for a new streaming skinny bundle even though Alphabet successfully bid for Sony's endorsement of YouTube TV as an alternative. Moffett believes YouTube TV's customer base grew by 300,000 anyway, though, expanding from around 2.0 million to 2.3 million users.

We also know Disney's Hulu Live TV headcount ended the first quarter of the year with approximately 3.3 million paying customers, up 100,000 from the 3.2 million subscribers it reported as of the end of 2019.

In the shadow of the coronavirus pandemic that's made television broadcasts sports-less (and accelerated an existing cord-cutting movement), that's actually a pretty encouraging outcome -- at least for a couple of vMVPD players.

Extending an existing trend

Last quarter's progress for Hulu Live and YouTube TV wasn't a short-lived stroke of luck either. A year ago, the working figure for Hulu Live TV was only around 2 million, and it grew to around 2.7 million by the third quarter of last year -- an estimate that aligns with data Disney has started to disclose in the meantime. It's now at 3.3 million.

Alphabet continues to keep its specifics regarding YouTube TV quiet, but it did confirm it was serving "over 2 million YouTube TV paid subscribers" as of the end of 2019. A little over a year ago, YouTube TV's headcount was pegged at right around 1 million. The current estimated count of 2.3 million suggests YouTube continues to do something right.

Moreover, both platforms have been able to expand their user bases at a time when AT&T was and Sling TV now is losing subscribers.

AT&T (AT&T TV Now) and Dish Network (Sling TV) skinny bundle subscriber count history

Data sources: AT&T and Dish investor relations. Chart by author.

It's not been pretty progress for Hulu and YouTube, but it's progress nonetheless.

The new norm

What makes YouTube TV or Hulu Live TV more marketable than AT&T TV Now or Sling TV isn't perfectly clear. The most observable common threads between the two winners and the two biggest losers are their backgrounds. AT&T and Sling TV's parent Dish is part of the proverbial old guard of the cable industry, whereas YouTube is a web destination outside of traditional entertainment circles. Hulu has the support and backing of the venerable Disney, which is a TV entertainment name but perhaps is not seen as a gatekeeper.

Whatever makes them different, Hulu Live TV and YouTube TV are both proving there's a market for skinny bundles. That market won't likely be as big as the United States' current linear cable market is, which currently stands at more than 80 million paying households, according to data from eMarketer as well as nScreenMedia. Craig Moffett is quoted as saying, "we doubt the DTC [direct-to-consumer] lifeboats will ever come close to matching the profitability of the business they are ostensibly designed to replace [linear cable]."

If there are fewer viable providers in the vMVPD space, though, they don't need to fully match their predecessors' profitability. Indeed, given the number of other ways Alphabet's Google and Walt Disney can monetize subscription-paying customers, their respective skinny bundles don't necessarily have to be profitable at all.

The much bigger takeaway for investors is that the skinny bundle isn't a non-starter; it's just gaining traction somewhere unexpected. Investors would be wise to keep their finger on the pulse of this surprising shift.

Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. James Brumley owns shares of Alphabet (A shares) and AT&T. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends Alphabet (A and C shares) and Walt Disney and recommends the following options: long January 2021 $60 calls on Walt Disney and short July 2020 $115 calls on Walt Disney. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Invest Smarter with The Motley Fool

Join Over 1 Million Premium Members Receiving…

  • New Stock Picks Each Month
  • Detailed Analysis of Companies
  • Model Portfolios
  • Live Streaming During Market Hours
  • And Much More
Get Started Now

Stocks Mentioned

Alphabet Inc. Stock Quote
Alphabet Inc.
GOOGL
$95.65 (-1.82%) $-1.77
The Walt Disney Company Stock Quote
The Walt Disney Company
DIS
$94.33 (-3.20%) $-3.12
Alphabet Inc. Stock Quote
Alphabet Inc.
GOOG
$96.15 (-1.98%) $-1.94
AT&T Inc. Stock Quote
AT&T Inc.
T
$15.34 (-1.22%) $0.19
DISH Network Corporation Stock Quote
DISH Network Corporation
DISH
$13.83 (-2.19%) $0.31

*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.

Related Articles

Motley Fool Returns

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Market-beating stocks from our award-winning analyst team.

Stock Advisor Returns
326%
 
S&P 500 Returns
102%

Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 10/02/2022.

Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.

Premium Investing Services

Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.