When you study a company as a possible investment for your portfolio, you probably examine factors such as its debt and cash levels, the growth rates of its revenue and earnings, its profit margins, its return on equity, and its price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio. Those are all good to look at.
Another worthwhile measure to check out is this: profit per employee -- or, alternatively, revenue per employee. Here's a look at why you might want to assess a company's profit or revenue per employee, along with a list of companies with high and low scores in that metric.

Image source: Getty Images.
Revenue per employee
Looking at how much revenue a company generates per worker can tell you a lot. It's a measure of efficiency, for starters, as a high number means the company is able to bring in a lot of sales with relatively few workers. Comparing a company's revenue per employee with that of its peers can also let you see which company seems to be more efficient. After all, if you need a lot more workers to achieve the same revenue result as a rival, that means you're paying a lot more in salary and benefits, not to mention overhead related to those workers, such as space in offices and/or other worksites. It's not always worth comparing a company's number to other companies in different industries, as some industries simply require more or fewer workers.
It's also informative to check how a company's revenue per worker has changed over time. If the number is growing, the company is getting more efficient and workers more productive. If it's shrinking, you might want to look into why that might be happening.
Revenue numbers for companies can be found in financial statements issued quarterly by publicly traded companies -- on the income statement. (Note that some use the word revenue while others say sales -- they refer to the same thing.) It can be a bit trickier to find the number of employees. The number might be included in quarterly earnings reports or even on the website or in the company's boilerplate section at the end of a press release. You can usually find it in the company's annual 10-K report, too. Searching for the word "employees" or "associates" is usually productive.
Who brings in the most and least per worker?
So which businesses bring in the most money per worker? Here are lists of the top and bottom 10 companies in the U.S., presented by the folks at smallbusinessprices.co.uk in 2020. (Their methodology: "Using a seedlist from Fortune 500 and Share.com, we were able to look at the top performing companies' revenue figures and compared this to their number of employees.")
Here are the companies with the highest revenue per employee:
Company |
Annual Revenue |
Employees |
Revenue per Employee |
---|---|---|---|
A-Mark Precious Metals |
$7.6 billion |
184 |
$41.3 million |
StoneX Group |
$27.6 billion |
1,701 |
$16.2 million |
Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) |
$120 billion |
7,400 |
$16.2 million |
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp (Freddie Mac) |
$73.6 billion |
6,621 |
$11.1 million |
Valero Energy |
$111.4 billion |
10,261 |
$10.9 million |
PBF Energy |
$27.2 billion |
3,266 |
$8.3 million |
AmerisourceBergen |
$167.9 billion |
20,500 |
$8.2 million |
Phillips 66 |
$114.2 billion |
14,200 |
$8.0 million |
World Fuel Services |
$39.8 billion |
5,000 |
$8.0 million |
NGL Energy Partners |
$17.3 billion |
2,400 |
$7.2 million |
Data source: Smallbusinessprices.co.uk, using data from the Fortune 500 and Share.com.
And here are the U.S. companies with the lowest revenue per employee:
Company |
Annual Revenue |
Employees |
Revenue per Employee |
---|---|---|---|
Yum China Holdings |
$8.4 billion |
450,000 |
$18,700 |
Darden Restaurants |
$8.1 billion |
180,656 |
$44,726 |
ABM Industries |
$6.4 billion |
140,000 |
$46,016 |
Hilton Worldwide Holdings |
$8.9 billion |
169,000 |
$52,698 |
Cognizant Technology Solutions |
$16.1 billion |
281,600 |
$57,262 |
Aramark |
$15.8 billion |
227,200 |
$69,497 |
Starbucks |
$XX billion |
291,000 |
$84,947 |
Synnex |
$XX billion |
231,600 |
$86,588 |
Hanesbrands |
$XX billion |
68,000 |
$100,059 |
McDonald's |
$XX billion |
210,000 |
$100,120 |
Data source: Smallbusinessprices.co.uk, using data from the Fortune 500 and Share.com.

Image source: Getty Images.
Profits per employee
It can also be informative to check out profits per employee, and some investors prefer such numbers, because while a company might generate massive revenue, that doesn't necessarily translate to massive profits.
Below are profits per worker for a bunch of high-profile tech companies.
Company |
Annual Profit |
Employees |
Profit per Employee |
---|---|---|---|
|
$18.5 billion |
44,942 |
$411,308 |
Apple |
$55.3 billion |
137,000 |
$403,328 |
Alphabet |
$34.3 billion |
118,899 |
$288,842 |
Microsoft |
$39.2 billion |
144,000 |
$272,500 |
Lam Research |
$2.2 billion |
10,700 |
$204,804 |
NVIDIA |
$2.8 billion |
13,775 |
$202,976 |
Intel |
$21.0 billion |
110,800 |
$189,964 |
Booking Holdings |
$4.9 billion |
26,400 |
$184,280 |
Micron Technology |
$6.3 billion |
37,000 |
$170,622 |
Texas Instruments |
$5.0 billion |
29,768 |
$168,537 |
Data source: Fortune.com, using data by Tipalti.
As you study companies to see which ones might deserve berths in your portfolio, take a look at revenue -- and/or profit -- per employee to see how efficient and productive they are.