About the Author
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.
Curious about the relationship between private equity and venture capital (VC)? Let's review the similarities and differences of these two investing strategies and the reasons each might be worth pursuing as part of your portfolio.
Private equity investors make controlling investments in distressed companies to make them more profitable and increase their value. VC investors fund early-stage companies with high growth potential. VC is considered a subset of private equity.
Private equity investing involves the buying and managing of companies that are not publicly traded on a stock exchange. The target companies are often distressed and become turnaround projects for the private equity firm. The goal is to revive the company deliver strong, risk-adjusted returns for investors in the process.
Private equity investing is often done through a private equity firm. The firm secures and pools capital from institutional and high-net-worth investors, identifies investment targets, appoints executives to portfolio companies as needed, and oversees the process of extracting value from the investments.
Private equity investments can be structured as leveraged buyouts, VC, or growth capital (GC) funding.
Private equity is a high-risk, high-reward investment strategy. Companies may not perform according to expectations, even with the new funding and oversight. In these cases, or when a portfolio company can't repay its debt obligations, the private equity firm and investors may lose money. When companies do flourish, however, private equity investors stand to earn enormous profits.
VC is a subset of private equity. As mentioned, VC funds start-ups and emerging companies that aren't yet profitable but have the potential to be very successful.
VC firms take an equity position in their target companies. If the company later reaches the performance targets, the VC firm can earn many times its initial investment. On the other hand, promising companies can regularly fail -- which makes the VC approach especially risky.
From the perspective of the target company, VC financing provides much-needed capital to build the business. VC firms also provide expertise and guidance around start-up growth that may otherwise be inaccessible. Additionally, VC firms can facilitate strategic partnerships among their portfolio companies.
There are downsides, however. VC deals involve some loss of control for company founders. Often, the VC partner requires influence over strategic and operational decisions, to ensure the company is moving in the right direction. Accepting VC funding also dilutes ownership, which decreases the founder's share of future profits and value creation.
Both private equity firms and VC firms provide financing to non-public companies with defined profitability goals. Despite the shared mission, however, the mechanics of the two investment disciplines are slightly different.
Key differences to note are the stage of the funded company, the size of the investment, the type of funding, the exit strategy, and the level of risk.
Private equity firms focus on acquiring and managing companies, ultimately to improve profitability and the company's value. They might establish operational and strategic control over the target company through an LBO or a management buyout. On the other hand, VC strategies are aimed at early-stage companies that may become extremely profitable one day.
Both strategies have potential risks and rewards. With diversification, both can play a role in a well-rounded investment portfolio.